How to reduce high column back pressure caused by a collection of particles that has transferred from the sample vial to the start of the column

• Related Articles

• Managing a gradual increase in back pressure over a column's lifetime

  A moderate increase in back pressure is expected over the lifetime of the column. When this gradual increase of back pressure is experienced, it generally does not affect performance. This can be reduced, although not eliminated, by using digest ...

• How to revive a column that has been blocked by a 'thick' sample

  A thick sample is often the result of precipitate forming after the addition of loading buffer to a sample vial. There are two things you can try to revive the column: Run 5 - 10+ blank gradients Run 85% acetonitrile at 400nl/min for an extended ...

• Peptides from a sample that are not captured during the loading step

  The stationary phase used in our columns has a lower retentivity of peptides than other stationary phases (peptides are eluted at a lower %ACN than other stationary phases). Therefore, there is a small amount of peptides that will not bind to the ...

• Low amounts (1mM - 10mM) of HEPES in a sample

  The presence of small concentrations of HEPES should not affect the column chemistry, however, there is a significant risk of fouling the emitter tip leading to spray instability as HEPES is not volatile and may deposit on the tip.

• Factors that cause ionisation issues with Aurora Series columns

  Spray instability can occasionally occur at high %ACN concentrations. This can normally be mitigated by ensuring that the nanoViper™ Fingertight Fitting is installed as instructed in the user guide. If you only observe spray sputtering for a small ...